RESiQ turns the evaluations you already collect into one clear record per resident.
RESiQ reads resident evaluations in any format and gives reviewers a structured summary of each resident before the meeting. If your program uses a system like MedHub or New Innovations, RESiQ works alongside it.
From a stack of forms to one record per resident.
RESiQ works with the evaluations you already have, whatever format they are in. It does the compiling, so reviewers can spend their time on the residents.
-
Ingest
Reads PDFs (native and scanned), images, Excel, HTML and Word exports. Handwritten forms are read with a vision model.
-
Classify
Identifies each document as one of 14 form types.
-
Extract
Pulls scores and comments into structured fields, with tiered retries for difficult forms.
-
Trace
Logs every stage. Each value carries a reference code back to its source form, so reviewers can check it.
-
Deliver
Produces one structured Excel workbook per resident, ready before the review meeting.
See RESiQ run.
A short walkthrough: evaluations in mixed formats go in, and one workbook per resident comes out.
Demo video coming soon
Sample output
The sample workbook uses fictional residents, faculty and programs.
Early results from our pilot program
Every score and comment links back to its source form, so reviewers can verify what was extracted.
Based on early usage in one pilot program.
What RESiQ is built to support.
Review prep is where we started. The same structured data is built to support more of what programs are asked to do.
Listed from what works today to what we are still testing.
-
Faster review prep
Compile and summarize a resident's evaluations before the semi-annual Clinical Competency Committee review.
In pilot -
Standardization across programs
One consistent structure and centralized reporting across programs that use different forms and systems.
Validating with programs -
Accreditation readiness
Consistent, traceable evidence of how residents are evaluated across the ACGME core competencies.
Exploring -
Compliance visibility
Spot gaps in evaluation completeness and consistency before they become reporting problems.
Exploring -
Retention and development
A longitudinal record that shows what shapes high performers and who may be at risk of leaving.
Early hypothesis
Where we are, and where we are going.
A record that follows every physician from their first evaluation to their last.
Over time that record can help programs and institutions see what shapes strong physicians, and build environments that keep them.
Today
We are hereWhat exists now
- Excel summary for each resident
- Ingestion of any format, including handwritten scans
- Early usage in an Internal Medicine pilot
Next
Planned next
- A live dashboard that fills as evaluations arrive
- HIPAA-compliant infrastructure
- Direct integrations with MedHub and New Innovations
Later
Where it leads
- Longitudinal physician record
- Retention risk and recruitment insight
- Cross-program benchmarking
- Predictive recommendations
This reflects our current plans. It will change as programs tell us what matters most.
Frequently asked questions.
Answers to the questions programs are most likely to have.
How do reviewers know the data is right?
- Every comment is captured word for word, one entry per respondent. Nothing is paraphrased or shortened.
- Each comment is checked against its source document. If it cannot be matched, it is flagged to check against the original, never dropped.
- A second pass looks for questions that were missed. Anything still missing is flagged for human review in a plain-language report.
- A question that is on a form but has no answer shows as "NO DATA," not a blank cell.
- Every step is logged, so any value can be traced back to the form it came from.
- When comment summaries are turned on, they never soften criticism. Critical and recurring issues are flagged, and each summary cites the comments behind it.
- RESiQ prepares the record. Reviewers still read it and make the decisions.
What does a pilot involve?
- Scope. A single program.
- Timing. One milestone evaluation cycle for each resident in that program. Milestone reviews happen twice a year, so a pilot covers one of those review periods.
- Start date. There is no timeline yet for when pilots can start. For now we are only collecting letters of support while we continue developing the systems.
- Letter of support. When a program signs up for a pilot, we collect a letter of support. We use it to help secure funding that lets us build out the technical stack and establish the requirements for organizational use in an early pilot.
Which formats work, and what about privacy?
- RESiQ reads evaluations in the formats programs already have: digital and scanned PDFs, handwritten forms, Excel, HTML, Word documents and images.
- To maintain resident privacy and confidentiality, programs can consider redacting resident identifiers from evaluations first.
Our focus right now: discovery and new pilot programs.
We are early, and we want to build this with the programs that use it.
Discovery conversations
We are learning how evaluation and review work in your program today, and where the process is hardest.
Conversations take 20 to 30 minutes and are with program directors, coordinators and GME leaders.
New pilot programs
We are looking for programs willing to run RESiQ on real evaluation data and tell us what works and what does not.
A pilot covers one milestone evaluation cycle for each resident in a single program. There is no start date yet: for now we are only collecting letters of support while we continue developing the systems. See what a pilot involves.
We started with Internal Medicine, and we want to hear from other specialties too.
Best fit: ACGME-accredited residency programs at teaching hospitals and academic medical centers.
Contact.
Adis Halilovic
Founder, Sabrati